A High Score Can Hide the One Problem That Matters

Category prioritisation is how a company decides which of its products to put in front of a new market first, and which to hold back. It exists because resources, distributor attention and early goodwill are limited, and not every category deserves them equally in every market.

The usual way to make that call is to rate each category on a handful of factors and combine the ratings into one number. That is sensible, and it has a built-in flaw. Averages let strengths cover for weaknesses. A category with excellent demand and healthy margin can post a comfortable overall score while carrying a registration pathway that takes most of a year. On the ranking it looks like the lead. In the market it cannot ship.

The fix is to decide in advance which factors are trade-offs and which are gates. Demand and competitive pressure can offset each other. Whether you are able to sell on your timeline cannot be offset by anything. A category that fails a gate belongs in a later wave, whatever its score.

Before accepting any ranking, ask what would have to be true for the top category to actually reach shelves, and check that first.



Previous
Previous

The Hero SKU Fallacy: What Southeast Asia’s Protein Bestseller Lists Reveal About Exporting Your Home-Market Winner

Next
Next

A Wider Range Rarely Earns More Revenue Abroad